By Simon Webb and Amena Bakr
SHARJAH, United
Arab Emirates, April 16 (Reuters) - Iraq's parliamentary oil
and gas committee is seeking to revoke a multi-billion dollar gas deal signed by
the oil ministry and Royal Dutch Shell ( RDSA - news - people
) last year, the committee's secretary said on Thursday.
Both the Shell deal and another multi-bilion dollar contract between Iraq and
China's state-run CNPC were illegal because they had not been approved by
parliament as required under Iraqi law, Iraqi MP Jabir Khalifa Jabir told
Reuters in an interview.
Shell's deal was unconstitutional and detrimental to Iraq's economic
interests, said Jabir, who worked for Iraq's state-run Southern Gas Company for
15 years.
"We are going to do everything we can to revoke this deal and to push Shell
out," Jabir said. "Both these deals are illegal because they didn't go through
parliament. The companies and their lawyers knew the old Iraqi oil law very
well."
Any new deals Baghdad signs in bidding rounds underway would also be subject
to revocation, Jabir said.
The oil ministry has said it does not need parliament's approval to sign new
deals. Jabir said Iraqi law 97 clearly states new deals must be passed by
parliament.
The committee had studied the preliminary Shell deal for the past six months
and all members agreed it was illegal, he said.
Shell signed the agreement last September to capture gas which Iraq wastes
through burning. But the deal has stoked opposition among MPs for giving Shell
monopoly rights on future gas production in the south.
"This is bad for Iraq's economy," Jabir said. "Under the contract Shell has
monopoly rights to all gas in Basra and the south. This is not right."
Jabir also criticised the lack of transparency in the deal's award, which
came without a bidding round. It was unconstitutional as the local provincial
government was not involved in the negotiations, he added.
The deal made no provision to prioritise domestic supply, he said, despite
the oil ministry and Shell having initially said it would.
"There are fears Shell will just take the gas and export it rather than
meeting increasing local demand," he said.
MORE SUBSIDIES?
The agreement gave Shell the right to sell the gas at international prices,
he said. That meant that if Shell sold the gas domestically, Iraq would have to
pay Shell international prices and then subsidise the price to industry and
power users.
The alternative was to charge local customers international prices, which
would put them at a disadvantage with competitors in other countries in the Gulf
receiving cheap energy supplies.
"This is to the detriment of Iraq's economy," he said. "We can't pay Shell
international prices and then finance the subsidies from the budget."
The committee would prioritise revoking the Shell deal before turning its
attention to CNPC's deal, he said. The committee had less concern about the
Chinese deal as it was less damaging to Iraq's economy, he added.
"If you have a deep wound on one hand and a cut on the other, you deal with
the wound first," he said.
Jabir said he was in favour of foreign investment in Iraq's energy sector,
but wanted the investment to be for the country's benefit and within the law.
Iraq needs billions of dollars to overhaul and expand its dilapidated
infrastructure.
A draft oil law that would set out the framework for foreign investment was
unlikely to be approved this year, he said. The legislation has been stuck with
feuding politicians for over two years.
"Too many people are involved, there are too many problems, and the oil
minister is happy with the delay and can make decisions with no accountability,"
he said. "The oil ministry is withholding information from the committee. Is
this democracy?"
(Editing by William Hardy)
Copyright 2009 Reuters
INTERVIEW-Iraq MPs seeking to revoke Shell gas deal - Source